Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Now They're All For Bipartisanship

By Molly Ivins, AlterNet. Posted November 15, 2006.


Apparently, the people of this country did not elect liberals to Congress last week. Nope, they elected populists!
Ivins

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also by Molly Ivins

Molly Ivins AlterNet Archive
An archive of the great progressive columnist's writings.
Jun 21, 2007

Stand Up Against the "Surge"
We are the people who run this country. We are the deciders and we need to raise hell.
Jan 12, 2007

Post-Election Etiquette
The Democrats won this election because we are involved in a disastrous war. We know how to do this: Declare victory, and go home.
Nov 9, 2006

More stories by Molly Ivins

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

Having watched election coverage nonstop all week, I sometimes wake screaming, "Bipartisanship!" and scare myself.

Of all the viral members of the media who have been suggesting that the Dems cooperate with their political opponents, the one who rendered me almost unconscious with surprise was Newt Gingrich.

Newt Gingrich, the Boy Scout. Newt Gingrich, the man who sat there and watched Congress impeach and try Bill Clinton for lying about having an extramarital affair while he, Newt Gingrich, was lying about having an extramarital affair. (This all took place during his second marriage. The first one ended when he told his wife he was divorcing her while she was in the hospital undergoing cancer treatment.)

This is the level of Republican hypocrisy that reminds us all how far the Dems have to go. I tell you what. Let's all hold hands together and sing, "Oh the Farmers and the Cowboys Should Be Friends!" Just not, please, Newt Gingrich, the man whose contribution to civility was to recommend that all Democrats be referred to with such words as cowards, traitors, commies, godless, liars and other such bipartisan-promoting terms.

Please, anyone but Newt.

Now, from my hours spent battered and half brain dead listening to the fatuous, self-important commentators of our nation, I learn that the people of this country did not elect liberals to Congress last week. Nope, they elected populists! Well, gosh all hemlock. I'll be go to hell. Populist! I AM one. Honest -- been a populist so long I'm on my third bottle of Tabasco.

Who knew? I thought all said I was chopped liver. Populist. Like Tom Frank of "What's the Matter With Kansas?" fame. Jim Hightower. We can even draw our lines of political genealogy -- via Ralph Yarborough and Bob Elkhart.

A populist is pretty much for the PEOPLE and generally in this case exactly the same as a liberal -- we just put the em-PHA-sis on a different syl-LA-ble. We also tend to be more fun. We do not vote to hurt average Americans, even if the corporate payoff is really big. Even if it's just a little bit -- like the bankruptcy bill.

We tend to focus less on social issues and more on who's gettin' screwed and who's doin' the screwin'. In my opinion, Americans are not getting screwed by the Republican Party. They are getting screwed by Large Corporations that bought and own the Republican Party.

The word populist was misused, abused and co-opted by right-wingers for years, ever since we were all forced to read Richard Hofstadter's "The Paranoid Style in American Politics." Bad history can do a powerful amount of damage. Most of us stopped at the painful news that Tom Watson, leader of the late-19th century populism, went on to become a raging racist bigot. Populism itself took on the connotation of bile and nastiness, a la Father Coughlin.

If you read back to the beginning of the populist movement, however, you will find Andy Jackson and the West set against all those dreary snobs of the East. When Andy opened up the White House and let in the people, all the snobs had the fantods.

OK, it's not the 19th century anymore, but it is always the right time to point out the emperor isn't wearing any clothes. Honest. There stands George W. Bush, buck nekkid. We want to help him out of this fix because he's dragging the whole Army, the country and the world down with him. But don't ask us to call those clothes.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: election06, bush, bipartisanship

Molly Ivins writes about politics, Texas and other bizarre happenings.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Republicans are just mercenaries for big business?
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Nov 15, 2006 11:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it's a mistake to let them off that easily.

"Vee vere just followink orders!!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is America paying attention
Posted by: charlesfrith on Nov 15, 2006 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my opinion, Americans are not getting screwed by the Republican Party. They are getting screwed by Large Corporations that bought and own the Republican Party.


... You people are really lucky to have Molly Ivins. I guess this forum is for the open minded but Molly knows an Industrial Military Complex when she sees one... P.S. The Devil takes cash. That's all you need to know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is America paying attention Posted by: Conservasaurus
Eisenhower warned of the military industrail complex
Posted by: jeffersonian on Nov 15, 2006 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What did he mean? Duh. I just don't know. I'm sure Halliburton/Bechtel/Enron/Raytheon/Boeing/Lockheed is far more ravenous and gluttonous than ANYTHING envisioned by Ike. And the ties to high level government officials much more blatant a'la Cheney than Ike could have imagined.

Eisenhower was a Republican president and five-star general for christ sake. But I guess all that money causes amnesia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

brute
Posted by: rsaxto on Nov 16, 2006 12:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Newt is now Hillary's brute which is a clear indication of how far from decency and from ordinary folks centrist Democrats have devolved. We need single payer health care, out of Iraq and all the other good government features decent Americans deserve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As if.
Posted by: ssegallmd on Nov 16, 2006 3:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the Democrats even confer with the Republicans then they are completely without self-respect. The Republicans have excluded, insulted, deceived, threatened and humiliated the congressional Democrats for as long as they have had the power to do so.

And if you go back one administration, there's still that matter of the Republicans sicking a special prosecutor on Bill Clinton practically from day one of his presidency, one who flitted from Whitewater to Paula Jones when he couldn't manufacture a scandal there, and then on to Monica Lewinski when he couldn't trump up any charges there either. That's offensive to me as a liberal citizen of this country, and an abuse of power by the Republicans. It should not go unpunished.

But it will. My team is represented by wimps who have already taken impeachment "off of the table". It tells me that the Democrats are not going to stand up to the Republicans on important issues. What they mean by bipartisan is for the Democrats to capitulate completely to the neocons, and that seems to be the menu given the first order of business: full immunity and pardons for Bush and Cheney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jackson was our Slobo
Posted by: jahaws on Nov 16, 2006 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before you glorify Andrew Jackson, you should take a look at his policies towards the Creek and Cherokee. The Minutemen can only dream...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jackson was our Slobo Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: Jackson was our Slobo Posted by: brotherjonah
Molly,time to take on the DLC
Posted by: flingus on Nov 16, 2006 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Skeletor Carville et al are trying to save the Republican wing of the Democratic party(DLC) by attacking Howard Dean for his 50 state strategy which is diluting their control of the party and their cozy relations with corporate America. "Republican Lite" should not be the controlling philosophy for the Democratic party. If it becomes so it may be time for a replacement party. I hope you will pick up a cudgel on behalf of the people and smite these Benedict Arnolds mightily.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ignore the Marshmallows...
Posted by: CMaciolek on Nov 16, 2006 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is only on question we must ask: do we want the USA to be an empire that rules by force and brutality, or do we want the USA to be an honorable equal in the global community? Everything else is just empty rhetoric designed to distract us from understanding that everyone in Washington is a Corporate Imperialist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Real Choice Posted by: Sparks56
do as I say, not as I do
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Nov 17, 2006 5:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I'm in power, I can do anything I damned well want. When you're in power, it's important that we work together so that I can impose my will *and* make sure that you can't rule unfettered.
Republicans' definition of bipartisanship is that both parties do exactly what the Republicans want done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Long Spin Cycle
Posted by: NoPCZone on Nov 20, 2006 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The MSM started spinning this election even before the results were in on election night. On all broadcast and cable nets, where they saw the exit polls and knew what was up before air time, they made a conscious decision to spin this and continue to.

You would think that Rep Rahm Emanuel was 'da man behind this election cycle according to the coverage and the beltway chorus. The fact is that much of his work was wasted upon candidates that did not win and a great number of newly elected Reps got in despite being dissed by the DLC crowd.

Washington coverage in the MSM is an insular culture and the prime practitioners are lazy. If it doesn't happen inside the beltway- it has no merit or importance. They also have a heavy Pro-G.O.P bias.

The Dems won because of what happened outside the beltway and despite what happened inside the beltway. Many state chairs have praised the 50 state strategy and credited with some of this year's success. The DLC crowd is now trying to co-opt the results of an election that was won despite them. Ask them why Sen Clinton spent $30 million when so many good candidates could have used some of that money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What we must remember:
Posted by: magistre on Nov 20, 2006 10:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all must remember that the Democrats are the other side of the same coin as the Republicans. The "bill of goods" that we've all been sold is that "there should only be two 'real' parties!". All others just can't be seriously considered. Why? Because then "They" would have to buy off more politicians. This won't be a "pretty" war but if we want our country back that is exactly what it will come down to!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I am a populist, Miss Ivins. I know populism. And believe me, YOU"RE NO POPULIST
Posted by: not_the_preferred_nomenclature on Nov 21, 2006 3:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
from the article:
I learn that the people of this country did not elect liberals to Congress last week.


That's right. White people make up the majority in this country, and why would any sane white person vote for a liberal? That is why successful Dems painted themselves as populists, not liberals. A major plank of American liberalism is that white people were slaveowners and are now therefore evil unless they subscribe to race and gender spoils politics.

Nope, they elected populists! Well, gosh all hemlock. I'll be go to hell. Populist! I AM one.


I know populism , Miss Ivins. I became a populist years ago. And believe me, YOU'RE NO POPULIST. You favor mass immigration and race based affirmative action. Therefore YOU are a LIBERAL.


A populist is pretty much for the PEOPLE and generally in this case exactly the same as a liberal --


No, liberals are for certain interest groups--blacks, hispanics, gays, yuppie females, educators. Just like the GOP is for rich people and large business owners, liberals also represent only factions. Just like the republicans, Dems are FAKE populists. Populism is leftism. The dems are fakeLeftists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bunch of keywords there.
Posted by: brotherjonah on Jan 13, 2007 3:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Somebody must be a subscriber or two of Google Adwords, and have a parked domain that is being rented out to them.The blue text, by the way indicates a hyperlink.
So while I appreciate their kindly spamming us with all those keywords,thus drawing attention in the search engines to our comments, people I got to tell you, don't click on the text.
You will see more advertising and pop ups than you ever thought possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stand up against the Surge
Posted by: brotherjonah on Jan 13, 2007 3:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I posted a nice comment for Ms Molly on that article, there is a link at the top to it.

In it I said some things about this very subject, having not actually yet read this article. Now I have. Thank you again Molly. Keep the Faith and like we Anarchists used to say, meet you at the barricades.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]